Nima Rostami Alkhorshid:
How did Vladimir Putin respond to the ceasefire proposal?
How do you view Keith Kellogg's removal from negotiations?
Do you find Zelensky's attitude towards Trump problematic?
Can the Trump administration better prepare European countries for a Ukrainian settlement?
What is the outcome of the ceasefire negotiations between the U.S. and Ukrainians?
How significant is the ability to talk directly between the U.S. and Russia?
How does Donald Trump aim to solve the situation in the Middle East, particularly regarding Gaza?
What was the outcome of the Arab states' summit on Egypt’s proposal concerning Palestinians?
How should Donald Trump handle escalating tensions with Iran?
What is the current situation in Syria, and how are the U.S. and Turkey navigating their interests there?
Matthew Hoh:
Putin's response has been deliberative and logical, signaling readiness to negotiate details.
Kellogg’s removal reflects Russian objections due to his close ties with Ukraine.
Yes, Zelensky's defiance highlights dependence on American support; without it, his government risks collapse.
The Trump administration seems more focused on asserting dominance than diplomatically engaging Europe.
The ceasefire proposal led to mixed reactions, with key leaders stating the ball is in Russia's court.
Direct talks signify a critical breakthrough, absent during previous administrations.
Trump appears to approach Middle East issues transactionally, considering relocation plans for Palestinians.
The summit’s impact remains uncertain; Arab states may prioritize self-interest over unified action.
De-escalation with Iran requires discreet negotiation rather than public confrontation.
Despite violence, Syria sees an orderly establishment of zones of influence, with ongoing great power dynamics.
